Recent Cases

December 15^th 2021
Leaving the Scene of Property Damage
Magistrate Hearing
Client was a very pleasant pharmaceutical professional who was charged with leaving the scene of property damage. When Attorney Barabino was retained, client had already received notice of the magistrate hearing and had obtained the police report and accident report(s). So that step being completed client and Attorney Barabino went to work. First developing a background memorandum on client after a detailed interview and also developing a legal memorandum of law. In addition, preparing client to testify at the hearing. And lastly, obtaining evidence from the insurance company that the full restitution for damages had been paid. The hearing was conducted and as hoped and to some degree expected, there was no probable cause found. As a result, there is never a criminal record or evidence of the allegation.
Result: Leaving the Scene Charge DOES NOT Issue Against Client

Shoplifting By Asportation
Magistrate Hearing
Client was a very pleasant father who stole several items valued at nearly $400.00. He was caught by the loss prevention and police were called. When police were called they took his information and eventually sent him a criminal citation. The citation called for a clerk magistrate hearing and the purpose of that date is to determine probable cause for the crime and if so, issue the complaint. However, there are exceptions to the issuance requirement at the hearing if probable cause is found. That is if in the discretion of the magistrate and the police department believe that this does not need to go forward. After a submission of a background memorandum and receipt of the civil fine paid, the clerk did not issue the complaint. As a result, the error in judgment of this otherwise person of character, will not follow him and his family. Charge Does NOT issue. Spotless record, remains spotless.
Result: Remorseful and Respectful Father’s Charge Dropped

December 1^st 2021
Assault and Battery on a Household Member
Assault w/ a Dangerous Weapon
Threat to Commit a Crime
Witness/Juror/Police/Court Official, Intimidation
Magistrate Hearing
Client was a very pleasant young woman with no criminal record. She was in a marriage that has a questionable origin and lacked the authenticity that she has a right to expect. She was charged with a variety of crimes; some felonies, some misdemeanors, all serious. At the Magistrates hearing there was what is called cross-complaints. Cross-complaints mean that one side has a criminal complaint against them, and the other side has a criminal complaint against the other, with generally the same set of facts. In this scenario, there exist the possibility of one side having the case issued against them, both sides having the case issued against them, or neither sides having the case issued against them. In our case, we suggested that there was impeachable evidence of immigration fraud. To further our position, we consulted with an immigration attorney that concurred and signed an affidavit and statement of falsehood on our behalf. We provided that to the other attorney, so there they could review to determine if they would still move forward given the experts affidavit. In the end, the other side, after consultation with their attorney, sought not move forward on their criminal complaint and we did the same. Both cases, were dismissed and both parties continue to have no evidence of appearing in any court.
Result: Felony Cross-Complaints Never Issue Against Client

November 10^th 2021
Impeding a Gaming Investigation
Cheating and Swindling Under the Gaming Act
Disorderly Conduct
Client was a very pleasant hardworking engineer with no criminal record. Client was charged with Impeding a Gaming Investigation, Cheating and Swindling Under the Gaming Act and finally, Disorderly Conduct. According to the State Police Investigation, client has caused a raucous at a gaming table and could not be redirected. A dispute with the pit boss led him to be asked to leave. He took his chip that he didn’t think was in play and did in fact leave. However, according to State Police, the game was in play and the taking of the chip was theft. In the end, a detailed memorandum was submitted to the Clerk Magistrate and state Police on the day of the hearing, including a background memorandum of defendant. Based on a variety of factors after the hearing, the court decides NOT to issue the complaint.
Result: Gambling Charges Resolved Without a Record

November 4^th 2021
Magistrate Hearing
Client was very pleasant gentleman who, while going to the local post office, was accused of assault and battery. He was interviewed by local police and eventually given a summons to appear at a clerk magistrate hearing. In preparation for the hearing, he and Attorney Barabino did an in-depth interview of the entire situation and the background.Additionally, in this case, we submitted a detailed background memorandum of the clients life and his obstacles. After the client was prepared for his anticipated testimony we simply wait for the court date. Today, the Magistrate determined that there was in fact NO PROBABLE Cause for the charge and the matter was withdrawn in it is entirety.
Result: No ASSAULT and BATTERY CHARGE

November 3^rd 2021
Clerk Magistrate Hearing
License Suspended, Operation
Speeding in Special Regulation
Inspection Sticker Violation
Registration Suspended
Client was a very pleasant professional on a F-1 Visa. Client was charged with a variety of low level infractions and criminal offenses. The client was charged with no valid license and speeding, no valid registration, and a bad emission sticker. Client simply made some oversights of this normally responsible lifestyle and when he was caught speeding-- the other charges were identified. Fortunately, client reached out to Attorney Barabino without delay. As a result, client knew to bring the ticket to the courthouse within four days and after that he and Attorney Barabino began planning for a clerk magistrate hearing. A clerk magistrate or probable cause hearing allows for the case to be reviewed PRIOR to formal issuing of the complaint. If successful, no record of the events will appear on the clients background check. In preparation for the hearing, he had client sign up for an 8-hour driving class, take the vehicle off the road and finally submitted a four page background affidavit of the otherwise very responsible client at the Magistrate Hearing. In the end, the case DOES NOT go forward, including the speeding ticket. CASE CLOSED.
Result: Magistrate Hearing For Driving Offenses Successful.

September 14^th 2021
Obtaining Drug by Fraud
Client was a super pleasant young man. A combination of factors led his down the path to take a moderate amount of a prescription drug at his employment. He knew it was wrong and in the chaos of life didn’t recognize how wrong it was. The employer called police, client made a heartfelt admission. Although, he resigned from his job, he had to deal with felony charges. Attorney Barabino and client began an in-depth interview and preparation. Attorney Barabino prepared a long memorandum on pre-trial diversion, complete with a significant background memorandum and affidavits. Prior, to the arraignment, an agreement was struck where client would enter therapy and drug testing and the client, if successful, would NEVER have the charges issued. The difference here is that the case was dismissed, prior to arraignment so no employment or agency will ever know what occurred.
Result: Felony Diversion Successful

September 1^st 2021
Malicious Destruction of Property under $1200
Client was a very pleasant student and musician. According to Police, client was being difficult while drinking at a bar in Boston and asked to leave. According to the report, client had broken a planter while being escorted from the premises. Client had been drinking in excess. Client very self-aware that he struggles with excessive drinking and the challenges. In the end, client wanted to fix the problem and do so as successfully as possible. Attorney Barabino was able to negotiate the District Attorney to stop the prosecution in its entirety. This agreement was contingent on Attorney Barabino providing evidence of 5 AA classes for client and restitution paid for the broken planter. As a result, case will be permanently dismissed in 60 days with no record or admission of wrongdoing.
Result: 60 Days Case DISMISSED