» Attorney Barabino

Unnatural and Lascivious Conduct, CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

April 28th 2017
Unnatural and Lascivious Conduct
Client was an educated mother and grandmother victim of drug addiction. During that period of addiction, police saw her making a movement and behavior consistent with oral sex to a known Level III sex offender. That event was nearly two years ago, and she has been in warrant status since. To client’s credit, she did what the court could only hope for in those missing years. She got herself clean and off drugs, into rehabilitation, and fully reentering society. For those reasons, and her otherwise decent criminal record, Attorney Barabino was able to argue that the Commonwealth’s sentence of a felony conviction, 18 months of probation, and various rehabilitation programs were not the answer. At the conclusion of the plea, the court accepted a 60-day period where her case would be dismissed if she remained out of trouble with no conviction.
RESULT: DISMISSED, if defendant stays out of trouble for sixty days

Probation Violation, PROBATION TERMINATED EARLY

April 21th 2017
Probation Violation/Surrender
A construction professional was on probation and charged with a new crime. The new crime triggered a violation of his probation. Attorney Barabino and client got new charge dismissed. The result was that the probation officer withdrew her request for a violation. At that same hearing, Attorney Barabino petitioned the judge to terminate his entire probation early and enter a dismissal. The judge, after a hearing, agreed, and the probation was terminated early and with no violation.
RESULT: PROBATION TERMINATED EARLY.

Assault and Battery with No Admission

April 11th 2017
Assault and Battery Chapter
Malicious Destruction of Property
Client was charged with malicious destruction of property under $250.00 and assault and battery on his girlfriend. In the early morning hours, police were called and an allegation was made of client punching a wall and, according to the accuser, also throwing a bottle at her, causing a mark (which was photographed). The case went to trial. At the day of trial, Attorney Barabino secured a very favorable deal, providing the defendant with no admission for any wronging or any probation or conditions.
RESULT: GENERALLY CONTINUED WITH NO ADMISSION OF WRONGDOING, & SECOND CHARGE DISMISSED ON $100 PENALTY

Leaving the Scene of Property Damage, NO PROBABLE CAUSE. CASE DOES NOT ISSUE

April 10th 2017
Leave Scene of Property Damage
Leave Scene of Property Damage
Unlicensed Operation of a Motor Vehicle
Client was working two full time jobs when he got into two separate car accidents. He did not remain on the scene, leaving for various reasons when he should not have. Fortunately, with adequate preparation time, client and Attorney Barabino were able to gather weather data for the date of the accident from the federal government, as well as work with the insurance companies to allow verification of the payment for damage. From this information, Attorney Barabino built a case with mitigation factors in place. A hearing was held and a decision was made that no probable cause issue—and the case did not proceed.
RESULT: NO PROBABLE CAUSE. CASE DOES NOT ISSUE.

Animal Cruelty, LESS COMMITTED TIME ON PLEA

March 15th 2017
Animal Cruelty
Animal Cruelty
Client was a hardworking father of four, with some criminal history. His roommates believed that he was abusing a dog shared with client, based on the dog’s recent behavior. The Police Department charged the defendant with Cruelty to Animals, based on video evidence provided by his roommates. Roommates filmed the Defendant kicking one dog multiple times and striking another dog with his hand. The case eventually went to trial. On day of trial, Attorney Barabino negotiated an offer for nearly half of the committed time previously offered, with a stay.
RESULT: LESS COMMITTED TIME ON PLEA.

Strangulation, RELEASED AT 58A, DISMISSED AT TRIAL

March 8th 2017
Assault and Battery
Assault with Dangerous Weapon
Strangulation or Suffocation
Client was living with his mother and had a history of various criminal offenses. At one point client's step-father called police and filed a restraining order against him. When police interviewed the mother, she reported that the defendant had tried to strangle her two weeks prior. A Dangerous Hearing was held since the District Attorney believed defendant was too dangerous to be considered for bail. Attorney Barabino argued for release and was successful. The case moved to trial. At trial, the lack of available witnesses for the prosecution resulted in Attorney Barabino requesting and receiving a dismissal.
RESULT: RELEASED at Dangerousness Hearing 58A and ALL CHARGES DISMISSED AT TRIAL.

Illegal Drug Possession, NEW TRIAL AND DISMISSAL

January 5th 2017
Criminal Procedure Rule 30: Post-Conviction Relief- New Trial
Drug, Possession Class B (Cocaine)
Client was a hard-working business owner and professional who sought to undo a past mistake. Years ago, after having been found guilty of possessing cocaine, he wanted to reverse that conviction. His contraband had been tested by a known, discredited lab chemist. The result was that a good faith basis to reverse the conviction was filed with an affidavit, memorandum, and certified supporting documentation. That package was filed with the court, and a hearing date was scheduled. In the interim, Attorney Barabino met with the District Attorney who was in agreement with his request. The Commonwealth did not file opposition. In the interest of justice, the motion for a new trial was allowed, and the case was dismissed.
RESULT: Motion for New Trial, ALLOWED, CASE DISMISSED.

Assault and Battery, CROSS COMPLAINT SECURES DISMISSAL

December 20th 2016
Assault and Battery
Client was a hard-working veteran and full-time US Army serviceman. He was charged with assaulting and battering his soon to be ex-wife. Conviction of such a crime would seriously threaten his military career. Fortunately, Attorney Barabino was able to cleverly find away around the charges. After an investigation, it was determined that the accuser appeared to have broken some laws. Attorney Barabino began the process for filing for a hearing to issue criminal charges against the accuser. The paperwork was filed and hearing was eventually held. At the conclusion of hearing, magistrate agreed with Attorney Barabino that charges should be filed against the accuser. A trial date was set but because charges were filed against accuser, she would incriminate herself if she testified. Both cases were consequently dismissed.
RESULT: Cross-complaint issued. Charges DISMISSED.

Criminal Infractions, CASE DISMISSED WITH NO CRIMINAL RECORD

December 8th 2016
United States District Court Violation Notice Possession of Class “D”
United States District Court Violation Notice Providing Alcohol to Minors
Client was a respectful young man who lived at a military post. As a non-military member, he was cited for two criminal infractions. Those infractions fall under of jurisdiction of the federal court. Attorney Barabino entered into discussion with the military prosecutors well before the hearing. The prosecutors were professional and smart and knowledgable about the details of the case. In the end, given all the factors, a non-criminal disposition was entered whereby the client would pay $850 and no criminal record or entry would occur (AKA: a forfeiture of collateral). The case was dismissed with no criminal record.
RESULT: CASE DISMISSED WITH NO CRIMINAL RECORD

Drug Distribution in a School Zone, CASE DISMISSED

November 2nd 2016
Drug, Possession to Distribute Class D
Drug Violation Near School/Park
Client was a young man in high school who was charged with distribution of marijuana in a school zone. After an investigation and digestion of the discovery and facts, a motion to dismiss was filed. The motion detailed the facts, the law, and argued how the case should be dismissed. The lengthy memorandum was filed and discussions with District Attorney additionally held. In the end, the hard working and professional district attorney agreed to simply dismiss the charges. All charges dismissed.
RESULT: Motion to Dismiss, FILED, CASE DISMISSED.