Recent Cases

Assault and Battery, Disorderly Conduct, GENERAL CONTINUANCE DISPOSITION

February 21st 2018
Disorderly Conduct
Assault on a Household Member
Client was hard working cement contractor who was arrested for giving his son a bloody lip (at the police station). Client’s son was arrested for operating under the influence of drugs and client went to police station to bail him out. When son got aggressive with father in the police station parking lot, father popped him giving him a bloody lip. Father was arrested and charged with assault and battery and disorderly conduct. Eventually, a trial was scheduled and set and moments before the trial was about to begin deal was struck which the defendant would receive a general continuance for six months on the assault and battery charge. The disorderly conduct charge was continued without a finding for three-month’s time.
RESULT: Assault and Battery charge GENERALLY CONTINUED FOR SIX MONTHS, disorderly conduct charge CONTINUED WITHOUT A FINDING FOR THREE MONTHS

Assault and Battery, Disorderly Conduct, NOT GUILTY

February 15th 2018
Disorderly Conduct
Assault on a Household Member
Disturbing the Peace
Client was a hard working father who had dispute with his daughter that resulted in him being charged with assault and battery, disturbing the peace, and disorderly conduct. A trial was eventually scheduled and held. There were a number of different versions of the event but the client and his witnesses were consistent on the witness stand with their version of the events. The Commonwealth’s witnesses waivered and were not consistent. As a result, the court delivered not guilty verdicts on the assault and battery and disorderly conduct charges, and only a one-hundred dollar fine for disturbing the peace.
RESULT: NOT- GUILTY OF ASSAULT AND BATTERY AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT

Assault and Battery Over 60, DISMISSED

February 1st 2018
Assault and Battery OVER 60/Disabled
Client was a Doctor of Research at a Pharmaceutical company when a family member suddenly struck him hard. He responsibly called the police to notify them of what occurred. However, after speaking to the person that struck him, the police determined that he was the aggressor and arrested him for this felony offense instead. Attorney Barabino prepared for trial confident in the innocence of his client and the strength of his case despite the severe consequences of a potential conviction--client would certainly lose his prosperous employment, be deported and separated from his wife and children (as he was on a “green card”), and possibly serve prison time as a convicted felon. At the day of trial, Commonwealth was unable to proceed as a necessary witness was unavailable, and Attorney Barabino requested that the court dismiss the charges. Dismissal was subsequently entered.
RESULT: CASE DISMISSED AT DAY OF TRIAL.

Second Offense OUI, DISMISSED

January 30th 2018
2nd OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Leave Scene of Property Damage
Disorderly Conduct
Resisting Arrest
License Suspended, For OUI, Operating with Chapter 90 Section 23
Client, a young woman who was on probation for operating under the influence, was charged a second time for the offense. She had a list of additional charges that followed after her arrest. The case involved several eyewitnesses and statements. A comprehensive interview followed from the defense and eventually trial was scheduled. On day of trial, Commonwealth stated that they simply did not have the evidence to support the requisite element of “operation”. Case Dismissed. All Charges Dropped.
RESULT: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED AT DAY OF TRIAL

Assault on Household Member, DISMISSED

January 22nd 2018
Assault on a Household Member
Probation Violation/Surrender
Client, a federal government employee, was charged with assaulting a family member. After police came to his home, he was arrested and arraigned in court the following Monday. Client was on probation at the time in that very same court for operating under the influence of alcohol, second offense. The judge released him after an arraignment and a probation hearing was held the following month. At that hearing, the defendant agreed to a violation and was allowed no change in his probation. Attorney Barabino and client began to prepare for trial. At trial, Commonwealth, after speaking to the alleged victim, decided there was no case and dismissed charge.
RESULT: PROBATION SURRENDER SUCCESSFUL, CRIMINAL CHARGE DISMISSED.

Sex Charges, NOT GUILTY

January 9th 2018
Indecent Assault & Battery Under 14
Indecent Assault & Battery Under 14
Client was long-time senior manager for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Highly publicized accusations cost him nearly everything, with even the Governor of Massachusetts making his position on case known to the media. After nearly two years of litigious hearings and preparation, client's case went to trial. Client was found not guilty on both counts.
RESULT: Both Counts, NOT GUILTY.

Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicles, DISMISSED

December 29th 2017
Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicle
Miscellaneous Municipal Ordinance 14-1
Client was a young man about to begin his first year of college. According to police, he was driving recklessly, passing cars and almost striking an officer. When police stopped him they were concerned that he was under the influence of an intoxicating substance. In addition to the facts witnessed by the police officer, client was disrespectful and verbally combative with the officer. In the end, to avoid a conviction on his record, client agreed to being on probation for 18-months, a driver safety course, and an evaluation to ensure that he is not abusing illicit drugs. If successful, the charge will be dismissed at the conclusion of 18-months. Additionally, his speeding fine and charge was found not responsible.
RESULT: DISMISSED, on condition client completes 18-month probation with conditions.

First Offense OUI, DISMISSED After One Year of Probation, Civil Violation NOT RESPONSIBLE.

December 28th 2017
1st OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Miscellaneous Municipal Ordinance 14-1
Client, a successful business owner, was charged with operating under the influence of alcohol. According to the police, he was driving under the influence when he crashed into another motor vehicle. The effects of alcohol were clear and obvious. His breath test result was nearly double the legal limit, and a bottle of alcohol in the car was another factor indicating that this otherwise reputable business owner made a mistake. He came to Attorney Barabino desiring to resolve what he had done, as favorably as possible.
RESULT: First Offense OUI, DISMISSED After One Year of Probation, Civil Violation NOT RESPONSIBLE.

Strangulation, DISMISSED AT TRIAL

November 16th 2017
Assault and Battery
Strangulation or Suffocation
Client was a young man just out of high school when he was charged with grabbing his brother and putting him into a headlock. Police responded to the home, charged him with a felony, and Commonwealth successfully imprisoned him until the day of his trial with no bail allowed. Attorney Barabino was successful in securing his release until the day of trial, despite the District Attorney arguing for a 58A Dangerous Hearing Detention Hold. After his release from custodial detention, defense made normal preparations for trial. At the day of trial, Attorney Barabino and his client announced “Ready for Trial”, but with minutes to go before empanelment of the jury, the District Attorney announced that the complainant was refusing to cooperate and could not go forward. Attorney Barabino requested dismissal of the charges. Case dismissed. RESULT: CLIENT RELEASED PENDING TRIAL, CASE DISMISSED DAY OF TRIAL.

Sex Charges, LEVEL III SORB DECISION VACATED

November 11th 2017
Sex Offender Registry Board/Superior Court Judicial Review
Client had been on the SORB Registry when he was accused of second, separate sex crime. He denied the second accusation and was eventually acquitted. However, prior to his acquittal, he had a SORB hearing labeling him as a level III offender based on the charges. Attorney Barabino appealed the decision of the SORB. A timely Notice of Appeals was filed, with complaint and affidavits. Soon after transcripts of the initial hearing were obtained and memorandums of law exchanged between the parties. Eventually a hearing was held and soon after a written decision indicating that the original SORB decision was vacated and remanded to the board for a new classification hearing.
RESULT: Level III SORB Decision, VACATED, NEW HEARING.