Recent Cases

Assault and Battery, MOTION TO SUPPRESS FILED, ALL CHARGES DROPPED

June 20, 2016
Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon
Assault and Battery
Client was accused of fighting an adult and using a knife. Client claimed he defended himself and never possessed the knife. Opposing party called police first, so the client was targeted by police, using all resources they had available. Those resources included detailed video interrogations, DNA analysis, fingerprint analysis, as well as out-of-court identification processes. After challenging the detailed and professional job of the prosecutor for nearly a year on various points, a motion to suppress the out-of-court identification was filed and a hearing date was set. At the hearing, the District Attorney agreed that the motion should be allowed and that it was dispositive to the case. Case dismissed.
Result: ALL CHARGES DROPPED, MOTION TO SUPPRESS.

Assault and Battery, DISMISSED

June 9, 2016
Assault and Battery
Client was a hard-working mechanic who was accused by his ex-girlfriend of assaulting and battering her. It was an unfounded accusation. There had been a verbal argument and the uninjured girlfriend made various statements to police. The stories she told police were inconsistent and damaged her already questionable credibility. A trial date was set. The accuser failed to appear so the court had little option but to allow Attorney Barabino’s Motion to Dismiss.
Result: Charge of Assault and Battery, DISMISSED.

Negligent Operation, CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AFTER 90 DAYS

June 8, 2016
Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicle
A retired teacher was accused of negligently operating a motor vehicle. There were four separate witnesses, including a police officer who witnessed the motor vehicle crash. The witnesses were not helpful to the defendant. A plea was made before the judge asking for ninety-day probation. The District Attorney sought slightly more probation time. In the end, the judge sided with Attorney Barabino and allowed the defendant’s case to be dismissed, as long as she stayed out of trouble, for a ninety-day period—otherwise called a continuance without a finding (CWOF).
Result: Case to be DISMISSED AFTER 90 DAYS, with NO CONVICTION ON RECORD. Enroll in two driver safety courses.

First offense OUI, Same Day PLEA, Open Container, NOT RESPONSIBLE

June 1, 2016
1st OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Marked Lanes Violation
Client was a young man who was having substantial substance abuse issues. He was in a motor vehicle accident and was clearly intoxicated. As the client resided out of state, Attorney Barabino arranged for probation to be transferred and negotiated with the district attorney to resolve the matter on the same day as arraignment. No restitution needed to be paid. A finding of not responsible on the civil citation was determined. At the plea hearing, the judge sided with Attorney Barabino and granted the defendant a Continuance Without a Finding (CWOF), allowing the case to be dismissed. No drug or alcohol screens. All on the same day.
Result: Same day PLEA, out of state OUI-alcohol, open container, NOT RESPONSIBLE

Conspiracy to Violate Drug Law, Intimidation, BOTH CHARGES DROPPED

May 10, 2016
Conspiracy to Violate Drug Law
Intimidation of a Witness
According to jail security, client, who was an inmate, was involved in a scheme to have drugs brought into the jail. He was a target because he had been involved in drug dealing before. The case was developed with great detail by the investigators. They assembled recordings of phone calls, collected physical evidence, and found a participating co-conspirator to admit to the scheme. Then yet another co-conspirator admitted to the scheme. The drugs were sent to a laboratory for testing and were positive and the case was almost ready for trial. As the case proceeded, one of the four co-conspirators pleaded out to a sentence; then a second co-conspirator admitted his guilt and then another pleaded guilty. Only Attorney Barabino’s client remained, who had no such intention to plead guilty. Although he had been involved with drugs in the past, he was not guilty and was not going to admit to being so. Soon after, a separate hearing on a motion to suppress the identification was held to preserve his rights moving forward, and a trial date was set. The day of trial came and the required co-conspirator to prove the crime did not appear and the case was dismissed in full.
Result: All Charges DROPPED/DISMISSED

Assault and Battery, DISMISSED

April 7, 2016
Assault and Battery
Client was a hard-working painter and father to two beautiful children. He also was a long-time spouse to an equally pleasant woman. When he suspected she was texting a male friend, he took a glass of milk and drenched her in it. He lost his cool and he readily admitted it. There was no marriage waiver to enlist and there was no Fifth Amendment to invoke, so she was summoned to trial. At trial, the defendant's partner was interviewed by the victim witness advocate and the District Attorney. She was adamant that she was not going to participate in this prosecution. The prosecution simply agreed to dismiss the charge in its entirety, moments before trial.
Result: Assault and Battery, DISMISSED

Assault and Battery, CHARGES NOT ISSUED

March 31, 2016
Assault and Battery
Client was a young man who had an emotional outburst. Being hard to manage, his mother called the police to give him aid. When police arrived, they witnessed an assault and battery. This was not the first time the police had been to the home. Charges were filed and a clerk-magistrate hearing was held to determine if there was: 1) probable cause for the charges to be officially filed; and 2) if probable cause existed, could this case be deferred or resolved without criminal charges. Probable cause was found, but based on the complexity of all the issues, age of the child, and background, it was determined that charges would not go forward and none would issue.
Result: CHARGES NOT ISSUED.

Second Offense OUI, NON-JAIL ALTERNATIVE DISPOSITION, OPEN CONTAINER NOT RESPONSIBLE.

January 13, 2016
Second Offense OUI- Liquor or .08%
Marked Lanes Violation
Open Container
Client was a hard-working human resources professional. According to police, she demonstrated concerning driving. She was pulled over by police. They stated she smelled like booze, had slurred speech, glassy eyes, and problems performing a field sobriety test. She took a portable breath test and scored three times the legal limit. After substantial consultation and attempts to appeal her breath test refusal, a plea was sought. At the earliest date possible, client received non-jail alternative disposition.
Result: NON-JAIL ALTERNATIVE DISPOSITION. OPEN CONTAINER NOT RESPONSIBLE.

Domestic Assault and Battery, DISMISSAL

January 12, 2016
Domestic Assault and Battery
Client was a hard-working nurse, wife, and mother. According to witnesses, she drank a bit too much and slapped her husband several times. the Department of Children and Families was called but declined to investigate further. At arraignment, Commonwealth sought random alcohol screens and Attorney Barabino argued they were not necessary as a condition of release. The court agreed with Attorney Barabino, and the case was dismissed at trial upon assertion of the marital privilege.
Result: DISMISSAL

Marked Lanes, NOT RESPONSIBLE, Negligent Operation, DISMISSED

January 11, 2016
Second Offense OUI- Liquor or .08%
Disorderly Conduct
Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle
Marked Lanes Violation
Client was stopped by police after hitting the fence of a police station. Police determined that the smell on his breath, unsteadiness and related factors were sufficient to arrest—an assumption that was correct. Client had been drinking before and was surprised to realize his level of intoxication was as high as it was. The biggest factor for client was accepting responsibility and getting a license back at the earliest opportunity. Attorney Barabino and client were able to negotiate no jail time. Not responsible on Marked Lanes Violation. Negligent Operation Dismissed.
Result: Alternative No Jail Disposition, Marked Lanes, NOT RESPONSIBLE, Negligent Operation, DISMISSED.