» witnesses

August 30^th 2018
Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle
Speeding
Marked Lanes Violation
Failure to Stop
Client, a bank professional with no prior criminal record, was charged with the above criminal offenses. According to police, he was driving at speeds well over 100 miles per hour and failed to stop his vehicle when officers insisted that he do so. Attorney Barabino was hired, and at a Clerk Magistrate's hearing, Defendant himself testified and provided evidence to mitigate the circumstances of the incident in question. Defendant testified as to his clean criminal record, his clean Registry of Motor Vehicles (RMV) record, and his genuine remorse over what happened. As a result, no probable cause was found for the criminal violations and Defendant agreed to pay $400.
RESULT: NO PROBABLE CAUSE FOR CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS, Defendant pays $400.

August 29th 2018
Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon
Malicious Destruction of Property
Client was a respected business owner who, according to police, threw an object at a car causing permanent damage to the vehicle. After the incident, words were exchanged between client and accuser (owner of the vehicle). When police arrived, accuser cooperated with their investigation into the matter, and Defendant was subsequently charged with two felony counts of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon and Malicious Destruction of Property. Attorney Barabino was hired by client and gathered witnesses, photos, and others items and exhibits to offer an alternative explanation as to what happened for the Clerk's consideration. In the end, an agreement was reached by all parties involved that client would pay the amount of damage caused to the car in exchange for a resolution of the case.
RESULT: NO APPLICATION FOR COMPLAINT TO ISSUE

February 15^th 2018
Disorderly Conduct
Assault on a Household Member
Disturbing the Peace
Client was a hard working father who had dispute with his daughter that resulted in him being charged with assault and battery, disturbing the peace, and disorderly conduct. A trial was eventually scheduled and held. There were a number of different versions of the event but the client and his witnesses were consistent on the witness stand with their version of the events. The Commonwealth’s witnesses waivered and were not consistent. As a result, the court delivered not guilty verdicts on the assault and battery and disorderly conduct charges, and only a one-hundred dollar fine for disturbing the peace.
RESULT: NOT- GUILTY OF ASSAULT AND BATTERY AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT

June 9^th 2017
Lawrence District Court
Assault with a Dangerous Weapon
Client was a hard-working, self-employed IT consultant who was accused of spray painting political signs. The case was widely publicized and the accusation was that client was painting the signs during the early hours of the morning. Moreover, it was alleged that client tried to run over accuser, who spotted the client engaging in the spray painting, when she attempted to flee. While the client admitted to spray painting the signs, the part about running over the client was not true. A deal was attempted, to which the client would admit to the sign painting and complete fifty hours of community service and stay out of trouble for one year. However, the accusation of attempting to run over the accuser went to trial. Attorney Barabino presented reputation witnesses and others to build the defense. In the end, the court delivered a verdict of not guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon.
RESULT: NOT GUILTY OF ASSAULT WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON.

June 8^th 2016
Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicle
A retired teacher was accused of negligently operating a motor vehicle. There were four separate witnesses, including a police officer that witnessed the motor vehicle crash. The witnesses were not helpful to the defendant. A plea was made before the judge asking for ninety-days probation. The District Attorney sought slightly more probation time. In the end, the judge sided with Attorney Barabino and allowed the defendant’s case to be dismissed, as long as she stays out of trouble, for a ninety-day period—otherwise called a continued without a finding or (CWOF).
RESULT: Case to be DISMISSED AFTER 90 DAYS, with NO CONVICTION ON RECORD. Enroll in two safety driver courses.

August 15^th 2015
Client wanted the best SORB attorney he could find. Client was a young man who was accused in a different state. The SORB preliminarily classified him as a LEVEL III offender—the highest risk to reoffend. As a juvenile, client was caught in a FBI sting and accused of possession and distribution of child pornography. Moreover, he had an unsubstantiated sex-related accusation and intermittent drug involvement (Note: drug and alcohol use is a disinhibitor and weighed accordingly in their formal decision making process). In the end, client's family hired Attorney Barabino. Attorney Barabino spend countless hours interviewing and preparing a witness. Attorney Barabino prepared and submitted nearly 21 pages of written motions detailing various legal issues to the Board. In the end, a full and fair evidentiary hearing was held. The petitioner was allowed, through his counsel and witnesses, to inform the board of lawful defenses. Client receives notice that no registration is required.
RESULT: Client’s LEVEL III Status, LOWERED FROM LEVEL III TO NO LEVEL. NO REGISTRATION NECESSARY.

October 17^th 2014
Assault with a Dangerous Weapon
Client was a hardworking cleaner with three children. She had a boyfriend who had a hard time letting go of their relationship and accused her of waving a knife at him. The police performed a thorough investigation, which was helpful to client. A Clerk's Hearing was ordered and at the hearing Clerk declined to issue the complaint. Although the hearing lasted fifteen minutes or less, Attorney Barabino and client had prepared nearly an entire day's worth of effort collecting documents and interviewing witnesses. In the end, the Complaint did not issue.
RESULT: NO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ISSUED.

September 18^th 2013
Larceny from a Building
Client was a young man charged with the felony offense of Larceny from a Building. According to police and surveillance video provided by the establishment, the Defendant did take a pocketbook. However, after several witnesses testified that the bag was left untouched in his friend’s car and the Defendant testified himself explaining that his girlfriend had the same type of purse, the jury quickly agreed that he simply made a mistake.
RESULT: Jury Verdict: NOT- GUILTY