» OUI

June 19th 2018
1st OFFENSE OUI - Liquor or .08%
Improper Stopping
Client, a young professional, drank more than he was used to drinking and made the mistake of driving. He was charged with driving under the influence and a civil violation of improper stopping. According to police, he tapped a car while under the influence and vomited on his car door. Because of hitting the car, vomit, admission to drinking, and inability to perform major acts of coordination, decision to plea the case. Attorney Barabino negotiated in person with District Attorney, successfully reaching a "continued without a finding" agreement, otherwise known as a CWOF. A second negotiation session resulted in separate agreement for a not responsible finding on the civil charge. On day of plea, only disagreement between Attorney Barabino and the Commonwealth was a brains-at-risk program which latter sought. Judge ultimately agreed with Attorney Barabino, and client did not have to attend the additional program.
RESULT: 24D Disposition, CASE DISMISSED IN ONE YEAR, NOT RESPONSIBLE CIVIL INFRACTION, NO ADDITIONAL PROGRAM ORDERED.

January 30^th 2018
2nd OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Leave Scene of Property Damage
Disorderly Conduct
Resisting Arrest
License Suspended, For OUI, Operating with Chapter 90 Section 23
Client, a young woman who was on probation for operating under the influence, was charged a second time for the offense. She had a list of additional charges that followed after her arrest. The case involved several eyewitnesses and statements. A comprehensive interview followed from the defense and eventually trial was scheduled. On day of trial, Commonwealth stated that they simply did not have the evidence to support the requisite element of “operation”. Case Dismissed. All Charges Dropped.
RESULT: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED AT DAY OF TRIAL

December 28^th 2017
1^st OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Miscellaneous Municipal Ordinance 14-1
Client, a successful business owner, was charged with operating under the influence of alcohol. According to the police, he was driving under the influence when he crashed into another motor vehicle. The effects of alcohol were clear and obvious. His breath test result was nearly double the legal limit, and a bottle of alcohol in the car was another factor indicating that this otherwise reputable business owner made a mistake. He came to Attorney Barabino desiring to resolve what he had done, as favorably as possible.
RESULT: First Offense OUI, DISMISSED After One Year of Probation, Civil Violation NOT RESPONSIBLE.

August 16^th 2017
1^st OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Client, a young college graduate, was driving and struck a parked car. He was eventually apprehended and charged with a first offense OUI. Defense made several challenges to admission of evidence of the Commonwealth via motion to suppress. Although the court denied the motion, the court authored a well written and detailed 9-page decision for their rationale and basis. The client agreed to a plea that would place him on probation for one year—with the agreement that the charge would be dismissed from his record at the end of that calendar year.
RESULT: First Offense OUI DISMISSED AFTER ONE YEAR PROBATION AND PROGRAM.

August 14^th 2017
1^st OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Client, a young professional, sought counsel for first time OUI offense: she was pulled over driving without lights, failed field sobriety test, and made incriminating statements. After discussing the option of a trial or a plea, she opted for plea, in part, to accelerate her hardship license application. Agreement was hashed out and a "not responsible" on her civil infraction was entered at the first court appearance, with probation for the OUI charge. Client agreed to a plea that would place her on probation for one year—with the agreement that charge will be dismissed off her record after one year.
RESULT: First Offense OUI DISMISSED AFTER ONE YEAR PROBATION AND PROGRAM, CIVIL VIOLATION NOT RESPONSIBLE.

July 7^th 2017
2nd OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Miscellaneous Municipal Ordinance 14-1
Open Container
Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicle
Probation Violation/Surrender
Hardworking mother was on probation for operating under the influence when she was charged again for the same offense. Probation violation triggered. Attorney Barabino and client rapidly addressed the probation violation at one court and received an agreement with Commonwealth that she add the SCRAMM alcohol monitor to her probation for the first case. The second case (new offense), placed on a disposition date (today), on which an agreement was made where the client would receive no jail time on the OUI charge and would agree instead to attend a two-week impatient program, the negligent operation charge dismissed, the highway wrong-way charge "not responsible", and open container of alcohol not responsible.
RESULT: NO JAIL TIME ON SECOND OFFENSE OUI, NEGLIGENT OPERATION DISMISSED, HIGHWAY VIOLATION AND OPEN CONTAINER VIOLATION NOT RESPONSIBLE.

June 2^nd 2017
OUI –Drugs Serious Bodily Injury 2^nd Offense
Failure to Stop for Police
Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicle
Client, a retired teacher, was reported to police to be having some type of medical emergency and acting irrationally. Client drove off, driving erratically on opposite lanes of travel and reaching speeds of over ninety miles an hour. With police in hot pursuit, client hit a telephone poll, split it in half, while the car flipped over and burst into flames. Fortunately, police were at the scene to extinguish the flames, and rescue client. She was charged for OUI-drugs, failure to stop for police, and negligent operation of a motor vehicle. Attorney Barabino entered a plea on negligent operation, for which a disposition would take place in the future. The two other charges went to trial. A verdict of not guilty was returned on both the OUI-drugs second offense and failure to stop for police. There were challenges in the Commonwealths case and in the end, client was grateful for the efforts of all involved, including the police, who charged him. Another charge of serious bodily injury was reduced at a clerk magistrate hearing prior to arraignment.
RESULT: OUI-drugs, second offense, NOT GUILTY, failure to stop for police, NOT GUILTY.

May 5^th 2017
1^st OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Marked Lanes Violation
Client was a successful biotech executive. After leaving work late one night, he got into a one-car accident involving fire department property. At a plea hearing, the District Attorney sought that the accused be found guilty of an OUI offense, based on the severity of the crash. Attorney Barabino argued for a different outcome, which would preserve his criminal record and eventually have the case be dismissed. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court sided with Attorney Barabino and client began the process for obtaining his hardship license and moving on from his mistake. Attorney Barabino will continue to monitor any restitution owed for the damaged city property. Court issued client not responsible for civil infraction of Marked Lanes violation.
RESULT: 1^st Offense OUI, NO CRIMINAL CONVICTION, Civil Infraction, NOT RESPONSIBLE