» Attorney Barabino

December 28^th 2017
1^st OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Miscellaneous Municipal Ordinance 14-1
Client, a successful business owner, was charged with operating under the influence of alcohol. According to the police, he was driving under the influence when he crashed into another motor vehicle. The effects of alcohol were clear and obvious. His breath test result was nearly double the legal limit, and a bottle of alcohol in the car was another factor indicating that this otherwise reputable business owner made a mistake. He came to Attorney Barabino desiring to resolve what he had done, as favorably as possible.
RESULT: First Offense OUI, DISMISSED After One Year of Probation, Civil Violation NOT RESPONSIBLE.

November 16^th 2017
Assault and Battery
Strangulation or Suffocation
Client was a young man just out of high school when he was charged with grabbing his brother and putting him into a headlock. Police responded to the home, charged him with a felony, and Commonwealth successfully imprisoned him until the day of his trial with no bail allowed. Attorney Barabino was successful in securing his release until the day of trial, despite the District Attorney arguing for a 58A Dangerous Hearing Detention Hold. After his release from custodial detention, defense made normal preparations for trial. At the day of trial, Attorney Barabino and his client announced “Ready for Trial”, but with minutes to go before empanelment of the jury, the District Attorney announced that the complainant was refusing to cooperate and could not go forward. Attorney Barabino requested dismissal of the charges. Case dismissed. RESULT: CLIENT RELEASED PENDING TRIAL, CASE DISMISSED DAY OF TRIAL.

September 5^th 2017
Abuse Prevention Order
Client, a hard-working father, had been in a romantic relationship with a woman years ago. When the relationship ended, she secured a restraining order which prohibited him from being within 100 yards of her at all times. According to her, while she was working at her place of employment, he went to the place of employment and stared at her in violation of the order. Defense agreed that he did briefly walk by her store where she was working, but that he did not know she worked there and he was as surprised as she was to discover her there. Although a strong case for the defense, the Commonwealth felt otherwise. The Commonwealth brought the case to trial and even obtained prior allegations against the defendant to show his “bad acts”. At trial, judge ruled that the Commonwealth could not admit the prior bad acts, as a guilty verdict would surely mean deportation for the otherwise, innocent defendant. However, after witness after witness testified, a not guilty verdict was returned.
RESULT: NOT GUILTY AFTER TRIAL

August 14^th 2017
1^st OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Client, a young professional, sought counsel for first time OUI offense: she was pulled over driving without lights, failed field sobriety test, and made incriminating statements. After discussing the option of a trial or a plea, she opted for plea, in part, to accelerate her hardship license application. Agreement was hashed out and a "not responsible" on her civil infraction was entered at the first court appearance, with probation for the OUI charge. Client agreed to a plea that would place her on probation for one year—with the agreement that charge will be dismissed off her record after one year.
RESULT: First Offense OUI DISMISSED AFTER ONE YEAR PROBATION AND PROGRAM, CIVIL VIOLATION NOT RESPONSIBLE.

August 1^st 2017
Leave Scene of Property Damage
Malicious Destruction of Property
Client, young, bright teacher, was angered by her boyfriend. As a result of that anger she vandalized his car by keying it, consequently damaging it. At the conclusion of her moment of anger she bumped the car with her car when she left the area. Trove of background information was provided indicating that the couple have since fully resolved their differences. At the conclusion, agreement was made for client to be evaluated for anger issues, and if none exist, complaint will not issue.
RESULT: APPLICATION FOR COMPLAINT DOES NOT ISSUE, Contingent on anger evaluation within two months.

July 18^th 2017
Assault and Battery on a Family Member
Client and his girlfriend were arguing in early morning hours in the street. Police were called and interviewed both parties. Girlfriend said she was punched in the face, but soon after denied it, and was consistent in her statement. At the time of trial, couple had since broken up. Despite that breakup, she again came to court and said a lie is a lie, that she would not say he did it, ever—because he did not, she claimed. The District Attorney dismissed the case.
RESULT: BOTH CHARGES DISMISSED AT TRIAL.

June 9^th 2017
Lawrence District Court
Assault with a Dangerous Weapon
Client was a hard-working, self-employed IT consultant who was accused of spray painting political signs. The case was widely publicized and the accusation was that client was painting the signs during the early hours of the morning. Moreover, it was alleged that client tried to run over accuser, who spotted the client engaging in the spray painting, when she attempted to flee. While the client admitted to spray painting the signs, the part about running over the client was not true. A deal was attempted, to which the client would admit to the sign painting and complete fifty hours of community service and stay out of trouble for one year. However, the accusation of attempting to run over the accuser went to trial. Attorney Barabino presented reputation witnesses and others to build the defense. In the end, the court delivered a verdict of not guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon.
RESULT: NOT GUILTY OF ASSAULT WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON.

June 2^nd 2017
OUI –Drugs Serious Bodily Injury 2^nd Offense
Failure to Stop for Police
Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicle
Client, a retired teacher, was reported to police to be having some type of medical emergency and acting irrationally. Client drove off, driving erratically on opposite lanes of travel and reaching speeds of over ninety miles an hour. With police in hot pursuit, client hit a telephone poll, split it in half, while the car flipped over and burst into flames. Fortunately, police were at the scene to extinguish the flames, and rescue client. She was charged for OUI-drugs, failure to stop for police, and negligent operation of a motor vehicle. Attorney Barabino entered a plea on negligent operation, for which a disposition would take place in the future. The two other charges went to trial. A verdict of not guilty was returned on both the OUI-drugs second offense and failure to stop for police. There were challenges in the Commonwealths case and in the end, client was grateful for the efforts of all involved, including the police, who charged him. Another charge of serious bodily injury was reduced at a clerk magistrate hearing prior to arraignment.
RESULT: OUI-drugs, second offense, NOT GUILTY, failure to stop for police, NOT GUILTY.