Recent Cases

August 26, 2025
Magistrate Hearing
Shoplifting by Asportation
A young aspiring medical professional had much to lose. He was charged with stealing from a grocery store. When confronted by the store security, he abruptly left, despite being asked to allow them to interview him and wait for police. They were able to track him via his license plate and eventually they issued him a citation to appear in court. In this case, they issued the matter directly to the magistrate for a hearing. He was given a date and appeared. Attorney Barabino argued that despite the justification to move forward, client, who completed a shoplifting training course and showed great remorse, should be considered for a second chance. The court and the police listened intently and after determined that they would allow matter to not issue against the client.
RESULT: Complaint Does Not Issue Against Aspiring Medical Professional, Reputation saved.

August 20, 2025
Larceny Over $1200 by Single Scheme;
Conspiracy; Larceny Over $1200;
Larceny Over $1200;
Conspiracy
A young father with a limited record found himself facing serious charges. At the time, he was working in a position of trust at a car dealership. Along with several coworkers, he took part in a scheme to alter the costs of returns and trade-ins, allowing them to pocket money that was not theirs. The plan was unsophisticated, but the consequences were severe. After being charged, Client relocated to the South Coast. He was permitted to return home and attend proceedings remotely while Attorney Barabino litigated the case in Massachusetts. Negotiations led to a favorable resolution. Client admitted to sufficient facts on a reduced set of charges and was placed on probation for only 180 days. If he is not arrested during that time, the case will be dismissed, and no conviction will appear on his record. Importantly, Client was spared restitution obligations. Although restitution was substantial, negotiations secured zero payment from him, with two co-defendants covering the full amount. In addition, one conspiracy charge and one count of larceny over $1200 were dismissed outright. With this outcome, Client avoided jail time, restitution, and a lasting criminal record. He now can move forward and build a better life without a criminal conviction.
RESULT: Probation for 180 Days; No Restitution owed; Multiple Charges Dismissed; Record Preserved.

13 August 2025
Trafficking Cocaine
Larceny of a Motor Vehicle or Trailer
Altering Motor Vehicle ID Numbers
Destruction of Property Over $100
Larceny of a Motor Vehicle
Assault and Battery on a Police Officer
Shoplifting by Concealing Merchandise
Malicious Destruction of Property over $250
Removing and Altering a Motor Vehicle VIN Number
Probation Violation: Possession of a Burglarious Instrument: MV Larceny
Today was the final case for client who had sought to remove a variety warrants going back decades at five different courts. This case was referenced in a recent cases summary back in June 2025, where this client strategically and successfully removed four separate warrants for his arrest, dating back decades, without having post bail or go into custody. Once the successful removal of warrants was complete client, returned to his home state and did not have to return for future dates. Attorney Barabino coordinated to have all his appearance on zoom. Within the following six weeks that followed from removal of all the warrants, each appearance resulted in every case being dismissed in his favor, including a probation violation where the original probation officer from thirty years prior was still employed by the court. The success and effort taken for these warrant removals and subsequent dismissals was done well in advance of client’s arrival with a massive level of preparation and coordination—which resulted in the sought after result.
RESULT: All Warrants Removed; No Custody; Remote Appearances Allowed; Favorable Resolution, Dismissal in every case within 6 weeks of removal.

July 17, 2025
Felony Indecent Assault and Battery
Assault and Battery on Ambulance, Multiple Counts
Client faced serious felony charges following an incident during a medical emergency. While experiencing a medical crisis, ambulance personnel transported Client from his home. During the transport, he was intoxicated and disoriented. According to police reports, Client allegedly made inappropriate comments and touched a paramedic in an area that suffices for the charge of indecent assault and battery. The most serious charge, indecent assault and battery, carried a potential felony conviction and mandatory registration as a sex offender. Attorney Barabino launched a thorough investigation. Body camera footage, EMS records, and medical documentation were reviewed. Client also entered an intensive rehabilitation plan, including Vivitrol treatment and consistent therapy. His progress was documented and shared with the District Attorney’s Office. After extensive negotiating, the Commonwealth agreed to a Continuance Without a Finding on all charges. Client was placed on two years of probation with ongoing treatment and drug and alcohol screening. The judge also approved administrative probation and allowed Client to travel, making supervision less restrictive. If Client successfully completes probation, the charges will be dismissed.
RESULT: No Felony Conviction; No Sex Offender Registration; Charges to Be Dismissed After Successful Administrative Probation.

July 15, 2025
OUI Second Offense;
Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle
Client, a retired physician, was charged with her second offense for operating under the influence of alcohol. A concerned bystander noticed her vehicle swerving on the road and called police. Shortly thereafter, officers located Client and conducted a roadside stop. During the stop, they observed signs of intoxication, including slurred speech, red eyes, and an unsteady balance. An alcoholic beverage was also found in her center console. Client agreed to take a breathalyzer test. The result showed a blood alcohol level nearly three times the legal limit. The test was deemed admissible. Based on standard policy for second offenses within ten years, the District Attorney requested a 90-day jail sentence. Attorney Barabino zealously argued on Client’s behalf, citing her long professional career, the time that had passed since her first offense, and her strong commitment to recovery. The judge agreed. Instead of jail time, Client was placed on probation, allowing her to continue treatment and remain in the community.
RESULT: No Committed Time; Despite Government Request for Committed Jail Time. Negligent Operation Dismissed.

Warrants Removed in Numerous Courts Without Custody
June 25–26, 2025
Shoplifting by Concealing Merchandise; Larceny of a Motor Vehicle; Malicious Destruction; Possession of Burglarious InstrumentClient lived in Florida for more than thirty years. Aside from an early charge involving false identity, he led a stable, crime-free life. He moved south in an effort to begin a new chapter and leave behind influences that once led to trouble. But when he left Massachusetts, he had unresolved matters in four separate courts. These included drug trafficking offenses in one court, motor vehicle larceny and related offenses in two others, and assault on a police officer and shoplifting in a fourth. The goal was to prepare thoroughly, document his decades-long rehabilitation, and remove all outstanding defaults and warrants. That’s exactly what Attorney Barabino did. Client flew to Massachusetts and spent two full days with his attorney, appearing in court after court. All warrants were removed, and at no point was he taken into custody. There is a strong likelihood that each case will resolve favorably. Most importantly, he faced the system head-on, cleared his record of defaults, and walked away without spending a single day in jail. His future is bright.
RESULT: All Warrants Removed; No Custody; Remote Appearances Allowed; Favorable Resolution Expected

June 21, 2025
Shoplifting Over $250;
Shoplifting by Asportation
Multiple Incidents
A respected first responder suddenly found himself at the center of a serious legal matter. What began as a single shoplifting charge quickly unraveled into an investigation involving ten separate incidents. The stakes were high, but Client wasted no time after retaining Attorney Barabino. A compelling petition was submitted to the District Attorney’s Office. It outlined Client’s personal struggles, consistent work history, and the steps he had already taken to confront the root of the issue. While the first case was still pending, new allegations emerged. This time, they involved merchandise valued at over $250 across ten separate events. The situation escalated quickly. A magistrate’s hearing was held. After reviewing the full record, including medical documentation and evidence of ongoing treatment, the magistrate declined to issue the new charges. The original case was resolved with a $250 court cost and dismissed. Client kept his employment
RESULT: No Magistrate Complaint Issued; Original Case Dismissed on Court Costs;

June 20, 2025
Assault and Battery on a Police Officer;
Resisting Arrest
What began as a tense moment between family members ended with a devoted father facing criminal charges for the first time. When police arrived, a mix of heightened emotions and a language barrier led to brief physical contact with an officer. The result was a felony complaint for assault and battery on a police officer and resisting arrest. A conviction or even an admission to sufficient facts would have placed his immigration status at risk. Attorney Barabino acted quickly. He reviewed the footage, spoke with witnesses, and gathered key background details. A concise packet, including affidavits, was submitted to the District Attorney with a request to preserve the client’s presumption of innocence. The Commonwealth agreed. The case was continued for 180 days under pretrial probation, with no admission, no conditions, and no further court appearances. If Client is not arrested during that time, the charges will be dismissed in full.
RESULT: No Admission of Wrongdoing; Case to Be Dismissed After 180 Days; Immigration Status Protected