Recent Cases

Shoplifting, NO COMPLAINT TO ISSUE

October 28th 2016
Shoplifting by Asportation
Client was a young man who stole and was caught doing so. He admitted to doing what he did, but felt embarrassed and apologetic. Fortunately, he was given a clerk magistrate hearing. He hired Attorney Barabino, who took him to the hearing and acknowledged his wrongdoing and asked for consideration. The police and court determined that based on various factors that they would not issue the charges. No complaint to issue. Never appears on a record.
RESULT: NO COMPLAINT TO ISSUE

Drug Possession, ADMINISTRATIVE PROBATION WITH NO CONDITIONS OR OBLIGATIONS AND NO DRUG TESTING

October 7th 2016
Drug, Possession to Distribute
Drug, Possession to Distribute
Client was caught with a significant amount of Percocet, Suboxone and Cocaine. In addition, he was found with over $1000 in cash hidden away in a secret stash. After various motions were litigated and experts consulted, a last minute plea agreement was made where client would be on probation for 18 months with no jail time, and have no probation obligations such as drug testing or outpatient treatment. Client needed this outcome as he has a young child and employment obligations which would have conflicted with any other, more stringent requirements like jail time. Moreover, client had been convicted of distribution on prior occasions.
RESULT: Administrative Probation, NO CONDITIONS OR OBLIGATIONS AND NO DRUG TESTING

Rape Investigation, NO CHARGES FILED

October 5th 2016
Rape of Child, Force
Client was living out of state when he found out that he was being investigated for rape allegations. The allegations were from nearly two decades ago. The victim was related to him, and there were various family dynamics that caused the case to re-surface. In the end, no-charges filed.
RESULT: NO CHARGES FILED.

Shoplifting, NO COMPLAINT TO ISSUE

October 3rd 2016
Shoplifting by Asportation
Client took items that did not belong to her. To summarize, the acts that she committed were sufficient for a charge and conviction of shoplifting. However, the clerk magistrate hearing process in Massachusetts allows for representation by an attorney at the hearing. In this case, Attorney Barabino was selected. He went to the scene of the incident, conducted a detailed review with client on her background, and had a discussion with the storeowner. After the hearing—no issue processed. Client free to leave with no evidence of any charge ever being filed. No Charges Issue.
RESULT: NO COMPLAINT TO ISSUE

Not Guilty of Attempted Murder and More

August 18th 2016
Attempted Murder
Stalking
Intimidation of a Witness
Assault with a Dangerous Weapon
Assault and Battery
Assault and Battery
Assault and Battery
Client was a young man who was indicted on the above charges. The case involved a variety of legal issues and challenges to prepare the case for trial, which occurred over a two-year period. In addition to various discoveries, Attorney Barabino had physician expert on standby ready to testify for the defense. After four days of trial, the jury returned verdict of not guilty on all counts, with the exception of two misdemeanors.
RESULT: Jury Verdict: NOT-GUILTY OF ATTEMPTED MURDER, STALKING, INTIMIDATION OF A WITNESS, ASSAULT AND BATTERY AND ASSAULT WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON.

Sex Offense, LEVEL II REDUCED TO LEVEL I

July 21st 2016
Sex Offender Registry Board
Client was an older gentleman who was successful in every aspect of his life. However, abuse of alcohol led him to act on sexual impulses. He was represented by another counsel at a plea in Superior Court for sexual abuse. Shortly after his plea, he was instructed to register as a LEVEL II offender. Attorney Barabino and client sought to challenge the LEVEL II designation. After thorough preparation and review, a hearing was scheduled. At the hearing, Attorney Barabino and client made their case to the SORB official. After months of waiting on the final decision, the SORB reclassified client to LEVEL I, which allows him to avoid public dissemination of his status.
RESULT: SORB sex offender level reduced from LEVEL II TO LEVEL I

Unlicensed Operation & Speeding, DISMISSED WITH NO FINE, Forging RMV signature, DISMISSED ON $250.00

July 14th 2016
Unlicensed Operation of a Motor Vehicle
RMV Signature, Forge, Misuse Section
Speeding in Violation of Special Regulation
Client was a chief who was charged with driving on a false license, doing so illegally, and speeding. He was an otherwise reputable member of the community. Charges were negotiated and resolved in just two court appearances. Client paid court fee at conclusion of matter in court and no record for an employer or immigration.
RESULT: Charge of Unlicensed Operation & Speeding, DISMISSED, NO FINE. Forging RMV signature, DISMISSED on $250.00.

Assault and Battery, CONDITIONAL PROBATION WITHOUT GUILT

July 12th 2016
Assault and Battery
Client was a hard working electrician accused by family member of assault and battery. The family member was relentless in her pursuit, alleging long term abuse. In this event she alleged that long term abuse by an alcohol abusing family member resulted in a bruise on her leg and PTSD. After intensive discovery pursuits of relevant materials, the case was scheduled for trial. On the day of trial, a last minute deal was struck whereby the defendant was to admit to “sufficient facts” for the charge and agree to be on probation for a period of a year. He would also complete and anger management program and alcohol screens—only if an independent evaluator determines he has a problem with alcohol. Otherwise, if the conditions are met, after one year of time, his case will be terminated with a dismissal.
RESULT: Assault and Battery, CONDITIONAL PROBATION WITHOUT GUILT.

Deface Property, DISMISSED, NO ADMISSION TO WRONGDOING IN THREE MONTHS

July 7th 2016
Deface Property
Client was a hard-working rug maker who had recently suffered immense hardships. Those hardships culminated in him developing a severe alcohol problem. After he drank one time, he took out his aggression on a neighbors’ vehicle, breaking the glass. His legal concerns included penalties, immigration consequences, and a criminal record. After a few court dates, an investigation, and consultation with the very responsive district attorney office, an agreement was made to allow the case to be dismissed, as long as any out of pocket cost were paid.
RESULT: Deface Property, DISMISSED, In three months, NO ADMISSION TO WRONGDOING.

Assault and Battery on a Police Officer, DISMISSED. Remaining Charges Dismissed if complete 6 months Unsupervised probation.

June 28th 2016
Assault and Battery on a Police Officer
Resisting Arrest
Disturbing the Peace

Client was a hard working waitress who was in a car accident. Police responded to accident. There was a dispute as to what happened next—however the defendant ends up being charged with assault and battery on a police officer, resisting arrest, and disturbing the peace. When police arrived, she was not comfortable with the officers that arrived so she called the police on the police. At that moment, police entered into a struggle with the defendant. The struggle ended up with defendant on the ground and the her being charged with assault on a police officer. Also, the client had two previous charges and admissions to assaulting and battering a police officer in the past. This case went to trial. The experienced district attorney saw that Attorney Barabino was ready and a trial was unavoidable. It was either dismiss the case or a trial. Defense would accept nothing less. Within moments before starting the trial, the district attorney agreed to simply dismiss the charge of assault and battery if client would take a six-month probationary period on the remaining two charges. The probation for the remaining two charges was a “CWOF”, which means continued without a finding, so that at the conclusion of the probationary period the two remaining charges would be dismissed. No Criminal Record and Assault and Battery on the officer.
RESULT: Assault and Battery on a Police Officer, DISMISSED. REMAINING CHARGES DISMISSED UPON CONDITIONS OF SIX MONTHS UNSUPERVISED PROBATION.