Recent Cases

July 7^th 2016
Deface Property
Client was a hard-working rug maker who had recently suffered immense hardships. Those hardships culminated in him developing a severe alcohol problem. After he drank one time, he took out his aggression on a neighbors’ vehicle, breaking the glass. His legal concerns included penalties, immigration consequences, and a criminal record. After a few court dates, an investigation, and consultation with the very responsive district attorney office, an agreement was made to allow the case to be dismissed, as long as any out of pocket cost were paid.
RESULT: Deface Property, DISMISSED, In three months, NO ADMISSION TO WRONGDOING.

June 28^th 2016
Assault and Battery on a Police Officer
Resisting Arrest
Disturbing the Peace
Client was a hard working waitress who was in a car accident. Police responded to accident. There was a dispute as to what happened next—however the defendant ends up being charged with assault and battery on a police officer, resisting arrest, and disturbing the peace. When police arrived, she was not comfortable with the officers that arrived so she called the police on the police. At that moment, police entered into a struggle with the defendant. The struggle ended up with defendant on the ground and the her being charged with assault on a police officer. Also, the client had two previous charges and admissions to assaulting and battering a police officer in the past. This case went to trial. The experienced district attorney saw that Attorney Barabino was ready and a trial was unavoidable. It was either dismiss the case or a trial. Defense would accept nothing less. Within moments before starting the trial, the district attorney agreed to simply dismiss the charge of assault and battery if client would take a six-month probationary period on the remaining two charges. The probation for the remaining two charges was a “CWOF”, which means continued without a finding, so that at the conclusion of the probationary period the two remaining charges would be dismissed. No Criminal Record and Assault and Battery on the officer.
RESULT: Assault and Battery on a Police Officer, DISMISSED. REMAINING CHARGES DISMISSED UPON CONDITIONS OF SIX MONTHS UNSUPERVISED PROBATION.

June 21st 2016
Assault and Battery
Client was hard working musician who was accused by his friend of assaulting and battering him. Although there was physical contact involved by defendant, it was the accuser who was the first aggressor, as client recalled it. Also, it was clear that the friend did more damage than the client did. Client's defense was self-defense. With client prepared, a trial date was eventually scheduled, at which time the district attorney declined to prosecute the case presumably after hearing from a disinterested accuser. Case dismissed.
RESULT: ALL CHARGES DROPPED

June 20^th 2016
Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon
Assault and Battery
Client was accused of fighting an adult and using a knife. Client claimed he defended himself and never possessed the knife. Opposing party called police first, so client targeted by police, using all recourses they had available. Those resources included detailed video interrogations, DNA analysis, fingerprint analysis, as well as out-of-court identification processes. After challenging the detailed and professional job of the prosecutor for nearly a year on various points, a motion to suppress the out of court identification was filed and a hearing date was set. At the hearing, the District Attorney agreed that the motion should be allowed and that it was dispositive to the case. Case Dismissed.
RESULT: ALL CHARGES DROPPED, MOTION TO SUPPRESS.

June 9th 2016
Assault and Battery
Client was a hard working mechanic who was accused by his ex-girlfriend of assaulting and battering her. It was an unfounded accusation. There had been a verbal argument and the uninjured girlfriend made various statements to police. The stories she told police were inconsistent and damaged her already questionable credibility. A trial date was set. The accuser failed to appear so the court had little option but to allow Attorney Barabino’s Motion to Dismiss.
RESULT: Charge of Assault and Battery, DISMISSED.

June 8^th 2016
Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicle
A retired teacher was accused of negligently operating a motor vehicle. There were four separate witnesses, including a police officer that witnessed the motor vehicle crash. The witnesses were not helpful to the defendant. A plea was made before the judge asking for ninety-days probation. The District Attorney sought slightly more probation time. In the end, the judge sided with Attorney Barabino and allowed the defendant’s case to be dismissed, as long as she stays out of trouble, for a ninety-day period—otherwise called a continued without a finding or (CWOF).
RESULT: Case to be DISMISSED AFTER 90 DAYS, with NO CONVICTION ON RECORD. Enroll in two safety driver courses.

June 1st 2016
1st OFFENSE OUI- Liquor or .08%
Marked Lanes Violation
Client was a young man who was having substantial substance abuse issues. He was in a motor vehicle accident and was clearly intoxicated. As client resided out of state, Attorney Barabino arranged for probation to be transferred and negotiated with the district attorney to resolve the matter on the same day as arraignment. No restitution needed to be paid. Not responsible on the civil citation determined. At the plea hearing, the judge sided with Attorney Barabino and granted the defendant a Continuance Without a Finding (CWOF), allowing the case to be dismissed. No drug or alcohol screens. All in same day.
RESULT: Same day PLEA, out of state OUI-alcohol, open container, NOT RESPONSIBLE

May 10^th 2016
Conspiracy to Violate Drug Law
Intimidation of a Witness
According to jail security, client, who was an inmate, was involved in a scheme to have drugs brought into the jail. He was a target because he had been involved in drug dealing before. The case was developed with great detail by the investigators. They assembled recordings of phone calls, collected physical evidence, and found a participating co-conspirator to admit to the scheme. Then yet another co-conspirator admitted to the scheme. The drugs were sent to a laboratory for testing and were positive and the case was almost ready for trial. As the case proceeded, one of the four co-conspirators plead out to a sentence; then a second co-conspirator admitted his guilt and then another plead guilty. Only Attorney Barabino’s client remained, who had no such intention to plead guilty. Although he had been involved with drugs in the past—he was not guilty and was not going to admit to being so. Soon, after a separate motion to suppress the identification was held to preserve his rights moving forward, a trial date was set. The day of trial came and the required co-conspirator to prove the crime did not appear and the case was dismissed in full.
RESULT: All Charges DROPPED/DISMISSED