» Court of Law

Criminal Infractions, CASE DISMISSED WITH NO CRIMINAL RECORD

December 8th 2016
United States District Court Violation Notice Possession of Class “D”
United States District Court Violation Notice Providing Alcohol to Minors
Client was a respectful young man who lived at a military post. As a non-military member, he was cited for two criminal infractions. Those infractions fall under of jurisdiction of the federal court. Attorney Barabino entered into discussion with the military prosecutors well before the hearing. The prosecutors were professional and smart and knowledgable about the details of the case. In the end, given all the factors, a non-criminal disposition was entered whereby the client would pay $850 and no criminal record or entry would occur (AKA: a forfeiture of collateral). The case was dismissed with no criminal record.
RESULT: CASE DISMISSED WITH NO CRIMINAL RECORD

Sex Offense, LEVEL II REDUCED TO LEVEL I

July 21st 2016
Sex Offender Registry Board
Client was an older gentleman who was successful in every aspect of his life. However, abuse of alcohol led him to act on sexual impulses. He was represented by another counsel at a plea in Superior Court for sexual abuse. Shortly after his plea, he was instructed to register as a LEVEL II offender. Attorney Barabino and client sought to challenge the LEVEL II designation. After thorough preparation and review, a hearing was scheduled. At the hearing, Attorney Barabino and client made their case to the SORB official. After months of waiting on the final decision, the SORB reclassified client to LEVEL I, which allows him to avoid public dissemination of his status.
RESULT: SORB sex offender level reduced from LEVEL II TO LEVEL I

Negligent Operation, NO ADMISSION OF WRONGDOING, License Suspension, NO LICENSE LOSS, CASE DISMISSED IN 12 MONTHS

November 24th 2015
Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicle
Operating Motor Vehicle with License Suspended
A smart, hard-working young computer engineer was charged with negligent operation of a motorcycle, speeding, and license suspension. According to police, she was traveling close to ninety miles an hour when she “goosed it” and tagged the back of a truck. Her pelvis, leg and shoulder were broken. After witnesses spoke to police, a determination that she was driving negligently was made and she was criminally cited. Also, because of her less than stellar driving record, a plea negotiation was agreed to where she would be required to take two driving courses and be on probation for a year with no attendance needed. Moreover, the plea allowed for her to take an “Alford Plea”, which means she didn’t admit she did anything wrong, important for her civil personal injury case. Also, no license loss as part of the agreement.
RESULT: ALFORD PLEA allows for rights preserved and NO ADMISSION OF WRONGDOING. NO LICENSE LOSS. CASE DISMISSED in a 12 months.

Motor Vehicle Theft, CHARGE REDUCED, 12 MONTH CONDITIONAL PROBATION, END OF YEAR DISMISSAL

October 22nd 2013
False Report of Motor Vehicle Theft
Client was a young, college educated professional who was charged with falsifying a stolen motor vehicle report. Although the young woman had been in previous entanglements with the law, she did not have a criminal record. If she were to be found guilty of this charge she would be a convicted felon. The consequences would be disastrous. After moving the case through the court for nearly a year and half, the trial date arrived. At trial, there was an option for a deal that became acceptable for the District Attorney, which included a reduction in the charge, as long as the young woman were to engage in therapy, remain drug and alcohol free with random screens, and pay a monthly fee to the court. The result of this disposition gave the defendant a chance to prove herself, remain an employed and productive member of society, while moving forward with her life drug free. A win-win for all involved.
RESULT: CHARGE REDUCED, 12 MONTH CONDITIONAL PROBATION, DISMISSAL at End of Year.

Larceny from a Building, NOT GUILTY

September 18th 2013
Larceny from a Building
Client was a young man charged with the felony offense of Larceny from a Building. According to police and surveillance video provided by the establishment, the Defendant did take a pocketbook. However, after several witnesses testified that the bag was left untouched in his friend’s car and the Defendant testified himself explaining that his girlfriend had the same type of purse, the jury quickly agreed that he simply made a mistake.
RESULT: Jury Verdict: NOT- GUILTY