| Armed Robbery In Wakefield |
Page 1 of 2 ARMED ROBBERY SUSPECT IN Wakefield—Joint Venture Liability If you are involved with someone who commits a crime they can take you down with them. It called “Joint Venture” which is “like” conspiracy but easier to convict. According to the Wakefield Patch, Ashley Mazac was a victim of such an allegation. But it doesn’t mean she is guilty---it means they can try and find her guilty. Under the theory of “Joint Venture” the jury would be told… "A defendant knowingly participates in the commission of an offense if he [she] intentionally participates in some meaningful way in the commission of the offense, with the intent required to commit the offense. Such participation may take any of several forms. It may take the form of personally committing the acts that constitute the crime, or of aiding or assisting another in those acts. It may take the form of asking or encouraging another person to commit the crime, or helping to plan the commission of the crime. Alternatively, it may take the form of agreeing to stand by at, or near, the scene of the crime to act as a lookout, or to provide aid or assistance in committing the crime, or in escaping, if such help becomes necessary. The agreement to help if needed does not need to be made through a formal or explicit written or oral advance plan or agreement; it is enough consciously to act together before or during the crime with the intent of making the crime succeed. "The Commonwealth must also prove beyond a reasonable doubt that, at the time the defendant knowingly participated in the commission of the crime charged [identify the crime charged if needed to avoid confusion], he [she] had or shared the intent required for that crime. You are permitted, but not required, to infer the defendant's mental state or intent from his [her] knowledge of the circumstances or any subsequent participation in the crime. The inferences you draw must be reasonable, and you may rely on your experience and common sense in determining the defendant's knowledge and intent. "Mere knowledge that a crime is to be committed is not sufficient to convict the defendant. The Commonwealth must also prove more than mere association with the perpetrator of the crime, either before or after its commission. It must also prove more than a failure to take appropriate steps to prevent the commission of the crime. "Mere presence at the scene of the crime is not enough to find a defendant guilty. Presence alone does not establish a defendant's knowing participation in the crime, even if a person knew about the intended crime in advance and took no steps to prevent it. To find a defendant guilty, there must be proof that the defendant intentionally participated in some fashion in committing that particular crime and had or shared the intent required to commit the crime. It is not enough to show that the defendant simply was present when the crime was committed or that he [she] knew about it in advance." COMMONWEALTH vs. TIMOTHY L. ZANETTI (2009) According to the Wakefield Patch, Wakefield Police detectives have officially charged Michael Gallella, 30, as the man responsible for robbing the Salem Variety Store in Wakefield at knifepoint on January 17. |
©2011 Law Office of William J. Barabino
Disclaimer
Attorney Website Design by The Modern Firm